Παρασκευή 15 Ιουνίου 2012


      Many fans who watch Disney believe Walt Disney Animation is no harm to children.If you give us a few minutes of your time we will tell you something which may enlighten you.
     Do you know who is Walt Disney?
Walt Disney was a 33 Degree Freemason Illuminati.Walt Disney and Ronald Reagan were good friends.Both men were high ranking Freemasons and both were involved heavily in the abuse of mind-controlled slaves.To prove Walt Disney was a 33 Degree Freemason just in case you have doubts going through your mind, I wish to share you some important information.



    Do you know what club 33 is ?
Club 33 is a private club located in the heart of the New Orleans,USA Square section of Disneyland.Officially maintained as a ''secret'' feature  of the theme park, the entrance of the club is located next to the Blue Bayou Restaurant at ''33 Royal Street'' with the entrance recognizable by an ornate address plate with the number 33 engraved on it like the sign in the right side which is Club 33's badge.But do you know what 33 stands for ? There are various origins that have been claimed for the name ''Club 33''.One says that Club 33 was named for Disneyland's 33 sponsors at the time. Another explanation is that Walt Disney chose the name simply because he liked the way ''33'' looked.One employee states , ''33'' was chosen because Walt's lucky number was ''3''.These are all FALSE!The Club 33 stands for Walt Disney was a ''33rd '' Degree Scottish Rite Freemason .

This is the door of the Club 33 in Disneyland.
















Now you know Walt Disney was a 100% 33 Degree Freemason.
So what is the big deal?
Disney uses Illuminati mind-controll through their cartoons.(!)The amount of subliminal messaging they use is beyond your imagination!Disney have been caught out so many times through their animation,they had to censor their cartoons and re-release them on DVD because people caught them out.Yet from this day , no charges have been made against them.The Disney's power, and the power behind them , has frightened most people away from challenging them.Disney has risen to become the unquestionable largest media-entertainment conglomerate in the world, & was ranked company no.48 in the top 500 companies by Forbes 500.

     
        Understanding Subliminal Messages.
The word subliminal literally means ''below threshold''.To elaborate on this it means that you are not aware of the message - it is below the threshold of your conscious perception.However you will still take the message in on some level as your subconscious mind processes it and stores this information still.Subliminal messaging therefore refers to the action of sending a suggestion directly into the subconscious mind.

So which Disney cartoons have Subliminal Messages?
Almost all of them!
The practice of including hidden messages goes right back to the early Mickey Mouse Goofy short movie animations.It started decades ago, and nearly all of their movies contain subliminal references to adult words, and even images.
Here is a quick run down of some of the most popular subliminal suggestions which have been found across Disney's portofolio:


Little mermaid subliminal                                                   Simba and the sexy cloud

















Donald Duck Racist?                                  














Minie Mouse and her dress--->










So you still think all Disney Cartoons are innocent ? Don't think so... Stay tuned we will be back with more and more interesting stuff ;)

Σάββατο 9 Ιουνίου 2012

Milgram's Obedience to Authority Experiment


Good morning ladies and gentlemen! Today , we are going to take a look at one of the most controversial experiments in history. Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority which proves that at least the common white American could behave cruelly and sadistically under strict orders of a ‘’leader’’ ( fully responsible of the result of the sadistic act ).Someone who obeys the order doesn’t feel guilty and this explains the behaviour of the lower police officers fighting against protsestors etc with extremely violent insticts.

Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience.He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative—even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.Miligram recruited subjects of his experiments from various walks in life. Respondents were told the experiment would study the effects of punishment on learning ability. They were even offered a cash award for participating!Although respondents thought they had an equal chance of playing the role of a ‘’student’’ or of a ‘’teacher’’, the process was rigged so all respondents ended up playing the teacher. The learner was an actor ( not a volunteer ) working as a cohort of the experimenter.

‘’Teachers’’ were asked to administer increasingly severe electric shocks to the ‘’learner’’ when questions were answered incorrectly.In reality, the only electric shocks delivered in the excperiment were single 45-volt samples given to each teacher. This was done to give teachers a feeling for the jolts they thought they would be discharging.

Shock levels were labeled from 15 to 450 (!!) volts. Besides the numerical scale, verbal anchors added to the frightful appearance of the instrument. Beginning from the lower end, jolt levels were labeled: ‘’slight shock,’’ ‘’moderate shock,’’ ‘’strong shock,’’ ‘’very strong shock,’’ ‘’intense shock,’’ and ‘’extreme intensity shock.’’ The next two anchors were ‘’Danger : Severe Shock,’’ and , past that, a simple but ghastly ‘’XXX.’’

In response to the supposed jolts, the ‘’learner’’ ( actor ) would begin to grunt at 75 volts; complain at 120 volts; ask to be released at 150 volts; plead with increasing vigor, next; and let out agonized screams at 285 volts.Eventually, in desperation, the learner was to yell loudly to complain of heart pain.

At some point the actor would refuse to answer to any more questions. Finally, at 330 volts the actor would be totally silent-that is , if any of the teacher participants got so far without rebelling first.

Teachers were instructed to treat silence as an incorrect answer and apply the next shock level to the student.

If at any point the innocent teacher hesitated to inflict the shocks, the emperimenter would pressure him to proceed. Such demands would take the form of increasingly severe statements , such as ‘’The experiment requires that you continue.’’

What do you think was the average voltage given by teachers before they refused to administer further shocks? What percentage of teachers, if any,do you think went up to the maximum voltage of 450?!

Results from the experiment :

Some teachers refused to continue with the shocks early on, despite urging from the experimenter. This is the type of response milgram expected as the norm. But milgram was shocked to find those who questioned authority were in the minority. 65% of the teachers were *willing* to progress to the maximum voltage level!!

Participants were debriefed after the experiment and showed much relief at finding they had not harmed the student. One cried from emotion when he saw the student alive, and explained that he thought he had killed him. But what was different about those who obeyed and those who rebelled?
Milgram divided participants into three categories:

Obeyed but justifies themselves :
Some obedient participants gave up responsibility for their actions, blaming the experimenter. If anything had happened to the learner they reasoned , it would have been the experimenter’s fault. Others had transferred the blame to the learner: ‘’He was so stupid and stubborn,he deserved to be shocked.’’(!)

Obeyed but blamed themselves:
Others felt badly about what they had done and were quite harsh on themselves. Members of this group would, perharps, be more likely to challenge authority if confronted with a similar situation in the future.

Rebbeled:
Finally, rebellious subjects questioned the authority of the experimenter and argued there was a greater ethical imperative calling for the 
protection of the learner over the needs of the experimenter. Some of these individuals felt they were accountable to a higher authority.

The question is : Why were those who challenged authority in the minority?

Sorry for the long post.Hope you found it interesting enough. We’ll be back with more and more interesting posts.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzTuz0mNlwU&feature=relmfu here is an example of this experiment.

Πέμπτη 7 Ιουνίου 2012

Some Of The Most Evil Children In History



Are you ready for a little shock to your ''sweet'' and ''warm'' hearts ? Most of you must believe children are so innocent and blah blah blah … they are just kids … the bad things they may do are not on purpose and the circle keeps going round and round … but is this true ? Are children always innocent … ? Today we are going to have a look at some of the most evil kids in history . Not the sweet ones that play with dolls and normal toys  but those who play with knives and handguns . What you are about to read may be disturbing so … let the brave ones read this post . So… Let’s start!

Joshua Phillips ( born March 17,1984 )
In 1998 , 14-year-old Joshua Phillips dludgeoned  to death his 8-year-old neighbor and hid her body beneath his bed.A week later , his mother noticed something leaking from beneath the bed.Joshua claimed that’s he’d accidentally hit Maddie in the eye with his baseball bat causing her to scream loudly.In his panic he dragged her to his home where he hit her again and then stabbed her eleven times!History failed to convince a Florida jury , who convicted him of first-degree murder.His mother is still appealing his conviction based upon the fact that he was given an adult penalty for him crime.

Jon Venables and Robert Thompson

Let’s see … Jon Venables and Robert Thompson ( both 10 year old boys ) had been stealing things all day at the shopping center like candies , a troll doll , some batteries , a can of blue paint , and other incidentals but … why did they decide to steal the 2 year-old James Bulger?!Was it a plot or a sudden, overwhelming compulsion ? Once they had him . they didn’t know what to do with him. Of course , the could have easily discarded him , leaving him alone on the sidewalk by a shop where someone would discover the crying baby , but Jon and Robert , like childrend who would rather destroy their own possessions than give them to another , MURDERED the little boy! Jame’s parents would never see their baby alive again. James was senselessly beaten to death by his ten-year-old captors, who callously abandoned him on the railroad tracks.

Mary Bell.

Our next sweet little girl is Mary Bell who was convicted of strangling a young boy names Martin Brown ,on May 25 , 1968 , the day before her 11th birthday. She was , as far as anyone knows , alone on this occasion, On July 31 , 1968 , mary and one of her friends named Norma Bell -who has no relation to Mary-took part in the death , again by strangulation , of three-year-old Brian Howe.Police reportes concluded that Mary Bell has gona back after killing him to carve an ‘’N’’ into his stomach with a razor (!), this was changed using the same razor but with a different hand to an ‘’M’’. Mart Bell also used a pair of scissors to cut off bits of Brian Howe’s hair and part of his genitals.As the girls were so young and their testionies contradicted each other, it has never been entirely clear precisely what happened. Martin Brown’s death was initially runled an accident as there was no evidence of foul play. Eventually his death was linked with Brian Howe’s killing in August, the two girls were charged with two counts of manslaughter. Mary was realeased in 1980 with court ordered anonymity. In 2003, the courts awarded her and her daughter anonymity for life.Such a nice story and such a sweet girl. Don’t you think?

So, you still have the same opinion about children ? Yeah they are all so sweet. Nobody said that they are all bad or evil but remember mental illnesses and paranoia have no age limit.Hope you liked it.We will be back with more interesting themes and events. 

Τρίτη 5 Ιουνίου 2012

Cannibalism


So we have seen many events of cannibalism passing through ages and ages, but isnt it very wierd that humans may eat humans?Flesh from their own kind ? What makes them do it ? Something controllable or maybe not? To my mind , this is an extremely complex issue and of course we cannot solve this problem but why don't we look deeper in the facts and in what exactly cannibalism is?
To begin with , there are different types of cannibalism: 
  1. Homicidal Cannibbalism which is killing a human for food
  2.  Necro-Cannibalism which is eating a human who is already dead.
  3. Endocannibalism which is eating humans from the same community.
  4. Exocannibalism which is eating humans from another community.

Now that we have an idea about what is cannibalism why don't we 


take a look at Why do people cannibilize each other?It doesn't 


seem really normal to me though. Anyway let's see...

A reason of people cannibalizing is ''Famine'' which is a widespread 


scarity of food, people are afraid of normal food and usually are 


scared of buying normal food from stores so some of them because 


of the starving may end up cannibalizing dead bodies or even alive 


people or even Self-Cannibilizing...Eating their own flesh and 


body.A really famous example is the Uruguayan Air Force Flight 


571.More than a quarter of the passengers died in the crash, and 


several others quickly succumbed to cold and injury.Of the 29 who

were alive a few days after the accident, another eight were killed 

by an avalanche that swept over their shelter in a wreckage. The 

last 16 survivors were rescued on December 23 , 1972, more than 

two months after the crash. The survivors had no food and little 

source of heat in the harsh conditions at over 3,600 meters (11,800 

feet ) altitude.Faced with starvation and radio news reports that 

the search for them had been abandoned, the survivors fed on the 

dead passengers who had been preserved in the snow. Wierd ? 

Isn't it ?Another reason of cannibalising are mental illnesses.Some 

people who are mentally ill obsess about eating others and actually 

do so, Such as Jefrey Dahmer and Albert Fish.




http://9gag.com/gag/4350864 <------------- Check this out ;)